Hi all.
Before I begin writing, I want to finally congratulate Jack on writing his first post on here since he became an author mid last month. He’s made up for it for making two short posts, no more than fifty or sixty words, tops :[
Anyway.
I want to say a little something about cliques. Kids under 17 years of age dominate this domain, and they are each a member of an extremely separated and sensitive group known as a “clique.” Said cliques each have their own name, ranging from preps, to dirties, to skaters, to nerds, to band geeks, so on and so forth. There are those other people who fail to acknowledge the fact that they are a member of at least one of these groups who go forth and attempt to create their own groups (i.e., “Awesome People” and “Teachers’ Pets”). These people end up going insane and spiraling down into the hell of dead cliques where there are many more stupid and rejected cliques.
There we go. I think you understand the basic meaning of a “clique” and how it works in today’s High Schools. On to the point of the message…
My point is – Why establish said “cliques”? I have no problem with a group of people getting together and congregating with people who have similar interests, but the last thing I’d want to see is for things to get competitive, or even vulgar or violent. Again, I’m fine with those who just want to hang out with people who like the same things they do, but the problem is, there’s those groups who think they’re just that more superior than the others because they act, dress, walk, or talk in the “best possible way; beyond compare.” These people are entitled to their own opinions, they can think they’re superior all they want, but is it necessarily true? No, not at all. But what really gets on my nerves is that these people talk down to “less-popular” cliques (AKA “Losers,” “Band Geeks,” etc.) and act like they own the place. That’s the straw that broke the camel’s back, right thar.
So let me know what you all think in the comments box be-low…
Posted by Robert 
Robert
Jack
